Active
Delta-8 THC and intoxicating hemp bans
Bob Hoban, Hoban Law Group · Last updated May 2026
On-record soundbite (1–2 sentences)
“States banning delta-8 without corresponding hemp program reform are creating regulatory arbitrage that will collapse the moment federal hemp rules tighten. The litigation posture for banned delta-8 operators is defensible in some jurisdictions, but operators should be building exits — not digging in.”
— Robert Hoban, Hoban Law Group
Extended quote (3–4 sentences)
“States banning delta-8 without corresponding hemp program reform are creating regulatory arbitrage that will collapse the moment federal hemp rules tighten. The litigation posture for banned delta-8 operators is defensible in some jurisdictions, but operators should be building exits — not digging in. I have counseled dozens of hemp companies through state-level bans and the pattern is consistent: early movers who pivot into compliant product lines or state-licensed cannabis markets come out ahead. Fighting the ban in court is expensive and the odds worsen each legislative session.”
— Robert Hoban, Hoban Law Group
Attribution
Robert Hoban, Founder and Managing Partner, Hoban Law Group. Quotes may be used in editorial coverage with this attribution line. For background briefings or custom quotes on adjacent topics, contact the press team.
Related Resources
Press Quote
FDA cannabinoid regulation
The FDA's failure to establish a regulatory pathway for CBD as a dietary supplement after five ye…
Press QuoteIntoxicating hemp federal regulation
The 2018 Farm Bill created a regulatory gap that the FDA was never resourced to close. Intoxicati…
Press QuoteUSDA hemp program and 2018 Farm Bill
The USDA hemp program established compliance infrastructure — testing protocols, sampling require…
