MarylandOrderMedium severity

Maryland Cannabis Administration Issues Corrective Order to Manufacturer for Non-Child-Resistant Packaging (February 2025)

The Maryland Cannabis Administration issued a corrective order requiring a licensed manufacturer to recall and repackage six product lines after investigators found packaging that failed federally-incorporated ASTM D3475 child-resistant standards, including squeeze-and-turn caps that did not require simultaneous lateral pressure.

Robert Hoban

Principal & Managing Attorney, Hoban Law Group

Colorado Bar

Full profile →
Agency
Maryland Cannabis Administration
Action type
Order
Published
February 14, 2025
Effective
February 14, 2025
License type
manufacturer
Party
MD Manufacturer F (anonymized)
Citation
COMAR 14.17.05.12; ASTM D3475; MCA-CO-2025-009

Background

Maryland Cannabis Administration (MCA) Regulation COMAR 14.17.05.12 requires all cannabis products to be packaged in child-resistant containers that meet or exceed the standards established under the federal Poison Prevention Packaging Act of 1970 (PPPA) and ASTM D3475.

Inspection and Testing

MCA compliance staff tested 18 product packaging formats from the respondent's manufacturing facility in January 2025. Six packaging formats — all using a squeeze-and-turn closure mechanism on concentrate cartridges — failed the ASTM D3475 Panel A child-resistant test because the closure could be opened by the test panel without applying simultaneous lateral pressure. This structural deficiency allows access by children who lack the fine-motor control to operate compliant child-resistant closures.

Corrective Order Terms

MCA issued Corrective Order MCA-CO-2025-009 on February 14, 2025, requiring the respondent to:

  1. Immediately cease distribution of the six affected packaging formats
  2. Issue a voluntary recall of all affected products sold within the preceding 90 days, with notification to all retailer licensees who received affected product
  3. Submit a corrected packaging specification to MCA for pre-approval before re-introducing the product lines
  4. Bear all costs of replacement packaging and re-distribution
  5. Submit a written compliance report to MCA within 45 days

No Monetary Penalty

MCA declined to impose a civil monetary penalty at this stage, noting that the respondent voluntarily cooperated and had no prior packaging violations on record. A future violation of child-resistant packaging requirements will result in mandatory monetary penalties under COMAR 14.17.01.06.

Industry Guidance

Manufacturers should require packaging suppliers to provide ASTM D3475 test certification for every new closure design. Third-party child-resistance verification — separate from supplier certification — is strongly advised.

Hoban Law Group

Affected by this action?

Our team has handled similar enforcement matters in Maryland and across the country. Schedule a consultation — we will prepare a regulatory briefing before you speak with counsel.

Schedule a consultation

Disclaimer: This page provides general regulatory information and is not legal advice. Regulatory actions may be appealed, stayed, or modified after publication. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this page. An engagement with Hoban Law Group requires a signed engagement letter. Privacy policy.