MassachusettsEnforcement ActionMedium severity

Massachusetts CCC Issues Consent Agreement to Manufacturer for Mislabeled Potency on Edible Products (July 2025)

The Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission entered into a consent agreement with a licensed manufacturer after laboratory re-testing revealed that 14 edible SKUs had THC potency values printed on packaging that exceeded actual potency by more than 15%, violating the CCC's ±15% variance standard.

Robert Hoban

Principal & Managing Attorney, Hoban Law Group

Colorado Bar

Full profile →
Agency
Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission
Action type
Enforcement Action
Published
July 10, 2025
License type
manufacturer
Party
MA Manufacturer D (anonymized)
Fine amount
$45,000.00
Citation
935 CMR 500.160; CCC-EA-2025-047

Background

The Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission (CCC) requires all manufactured cannabis products to be tested by an Independent Testing Laboratory (ITL) and labeled with accurate THC and CBD potency information. Under 935 CMR 500.160, labels must reflect the actual potency of each batch within a ±15% variance. Products outside this range must be destroyed or relabeled before sale.

Violation Findings

Following a consumer complaint and a CCC-directed market surveillance purchase in May 2025, the CCC's Investigations and Enforcement Unit sent 14 edible product samples for re-testing at a separate ITL. Results showed:

| SKU Category | Reported THC | Actual THC | Variance | |---|---|---|---| | Gummies (4 SKUs) | 10mg/piece | 6.2–7.4mg | -27% to -38% | | Chocolates (6 SKUs) | 5mg/piece | 3.0–3.8mg | -24% to -40% | | Beverages (4 SKUs) | 20mg/serving | 13.1–15.6mg | -22% to -35% |

All 14 SKUs were outside the ±15% CCC variance threshold.

Consent Agreement Terms

The CCC and respondent entered into a Consent Agreement (CCC-EA-2025-047) on July 10, 2025, including:

  1. $45,000 civil monetary penalty (payable in three installments)
  2. Voluntary recall of all affected lot numbers within 30 days
  3. Enhanced QC protocol — dual-ITL testing for all new product batches for 12 months
  4. Monthly reporting to the CCC on batch testing results for one year

Compliance Takeaway

Manufacturers should verify that ITL testing contracts specify sufficient sample sizes per batch to detect intra-batch potency variance. Edible homogeneity is a known challenge; manufacturers should conduct in-house potency spot-checks before ITL submission.

Hoban Law Group

Affected by this action?

Our team has handled similar enforcement matters in Massachusetts and across the country. Schedule a consultation — we will prepare a regulatory briefing before you speak with counsel.

Schedule a consultation

Disclaimer: This page provides general regulatory information and is not legal advice. Regulatory actions may be appealed, stayed, or modified after publication. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this page. An engagement with Hoban Law Group requires a signed engagement letter. Privacy policy.