$35M Cannabis M&A: Buyside Legal Due Diligence on Multi-State Acquisition
Leading the cannabis regulatory and license diligence workstream for a $35M acquisition of a multi-state cannabis operator, surfacing a material regulatory deficiency that enabled a $3.5M price reduction.
Confidential — Cannabis Acquisition Vehicle
$35M
Deal Value
$3,500,000
Price Reduction
5
Months to Close
The Challenge
The Challenge
A private equity-backed acquisition vehicle retained Hoban Law Group to lead the cannabis regulatory and license diligence workstream on a proposed $35M acquisition of a multi-state cannabis operator with dispensary and cultivation operations in Arizona, Michigan, and Ohio.
Cannabis M&A diligence differs fundamentally from conventional business acquisitions: state regulatory agencies must approve all ownership changes, and undisclosed license deficiencies — even minor administrative violations — can delay or prohibit regulatory transfer approval. The acquirer's financial diligence team had flagged the seller's financial statements but had no cannabis regulatory expertise to evaluate the three states' license status, compliance history, and change-of-ownership requirements.
Our Approach
Our Approach
License Status Review. Hoban Law Group obtained complete license documentation from all three state agencies — Arizona ADHS, Michigan CRA, and Ohio Division of Cannabis Control — and confirmed current standing, expiration dates, renewal status, and any outstanding conditions or investigations.
Compliance File Review. We reviewed 36 months of inspection records, violation notices, and corrective action plans. In Michigan, the review surfaced an unresolved CRA Compliance Order stemming from a packaging and labeling violation — an order the seller had not disclosed in the purchase agreement representations and warranties.
Change-of-Ownership Mapping. For each state, we prepared a change-of-ownership roadmap: regulatory filing requirements, ownership disclosure thresholds, background investigation timelines, and estimated approval periods. The Arizona analysis identified that two of the seller's passive investors would individually trigger Arizona's 10% ownership disclosure requirement under the new buyer's ownership structure — requiring pre-closing background clearance that was not factored into the LOI timeline.
Purchase Price Adjustment Recommendation. The undisclosed Michigan compliance order carried an estimated remediation cost of $380,000 and a 4-to-6-month delay in operational transfer. We recommended a $3.5M purchase price reduction in the form of an escrow hold, conditioned on resolution of the Michigan order prior to closing.
The Outcome
The Outcome
The acquirer negotiated a $3.5M purchase price reduction supported by Hoban Law Group's regulatory risk memorandum. The seller agreed to cure the Michigan compliance order as a closing condition, funded from the escrow reduction.
All three states approved the change-of-ownership applications within the projected timelines. Closing occurred 5 months post-LOI — within the acquirer's target window.
Hoban Law Group was retained post-closing as ongoing regulatory counsel for the combined entity across all three states.
Have a similar matter?
Schedule a consultation with Bob.
Hoban Law Group has handled every type of cannabis law matter across all 50 states. Tell us what you are facing — we will tell you how we can help.
